The survey has been emailed individually to all TSC Members from Surveymonkey. If you do not see it, please check your spam folder.
In the interest of transparency, I did reorder some of the questions in the survey and changed the attendance provisions to have a choice of 2, 3 or 4 missed meetings. Thanks! -kenny From: Kenny Paul <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 6:05 PM To: onap-tsc <[email protected]> Cc: Kenny Paul <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Members Composition Survey RFC - Respond by 18:00 Pacific time, May 7 Below is the survey that will be distributed to the TSC Members via Surveymonkey DO NOT VOTE HERE - THIS IS NOT THE ACTUAL SURVEY –DEADLINE FOR INPUT HAS PASSED When should the ONAP TSC move from “Startup” to “Steady State" operations at which point the TSC should be populated, not by Platinum Member designates, but instead by some other means, for which the TSC is responsible for defining? As soon as the new method for populating the TSC is defined After the Beijing Release After the Casablanca Release Other [Please specify time] Questions related to the composition of the TSC during Steady State operations 2. How large should the TSC be? 10 or less 13 15 19 21 30 Other [Please specify a number or other quantitative measure] 3. Company Cap - How many members of the same company, or related companies (as defined in Section 4.4.1.4 of the ONAP Technical Community Document), should be allowed on the TSC at the same time? 1 per company 2 per company 3 per company There should be no company-cap Other [Please specify a number or other quantitative measure] 4. How many seats (if any) should be reserved for the ONAP Platinum Members of record from 2017? None ≤ 5 ≥ 6 and ≤ 10 ≥ 11 and ≤ 15 ≥ 16 and ≤ 19 20 (current level) 5. How many seats (if any) should be reserved for any LFN Platinum Members? None ≤ 5 ≥ 6 and ≤ 10 ≥ 11 and ≤ 15 ≥ 16 and ≤ 19 ≥ 20 and ≤ 24 ≥ 25 and ≤ 27 28 (current level) Whatever membership number is permitted within the LFN Charter now (28) or in the future 6. How many seats (if any) should be reserved for the top ranked code contributing companies? none ≤ 5 ≥ 6 and ≤ 10 ≥ 11 and ≤ 15 ≥ 16 and ≤ 19 ≥ 20 and ≤ 24 ≥ 25 7. How many seats (if any) should be reserved for operators? none 3 5 8 (current) Other [Please specify] 8. Should we try to ensure a mix of operators and vendors on the TSC? Yes No 9. If {Yes} to #8 above, what should the mix be? At least 50% of the TSC should be from Operators No less than 40% of the TSC should be from Operators Other [Please specify a percentage or other criteria] Questions Related to Attendance Provisions 10. Should TSC Members be allowed to assign proxies with voting privileges Yes No 11. If {Yes} to question #10 a. should an elected TSC Members who does not attend two consecutive meetings without a proxy in attendance be dropped from the quorum requirement? 1. Yes 2. No b. should a non-elected or appointed TSC Members who does not attend two consecutive meetings without a proxy in attendance be dropped from the quorum requirement? 1. Yes 2. Yes and also forfeit their seat on the TSC 3. No 12. If {No} to question #10 a. should an elected TSC Members who does not attend two consecutive meetings be dropped from the quorum requirement? 1. Yes 2. No b. should a non-elected or appointed TSC Members who does not attend two consecutive meetings be dropped from the quorum requirement? 1. Yes 2. Yes and also forfeit their seat on the TSC 3. No Questions applying to special provisions for this election cycle only 13. Should ONAP Platinum Service Provider Members of record for 2017 that joined the Program after the launch (specifically Turk Telekom, Verizon, and Vodafone), be allowed to keep an appointed representative on the TSC if someone from their company does not get elected or appointed by other means? Yes No 14. Should all ONAP Platinum Service Provider Members of record for 2017 (AT&T, Bell Canada, China Mobile, China Telecom, Orange, Reliance Jio, Turk Telekom, Vodafone & Verizon) be allowed to appoint a representative to the TSC if someone from their company does not get elected or appointed by other means? Yes No 15. Should all ONAP Platinum Members of record for 2017 (all of the existing TSC Companies + Verizon) be allowed to appoint a representative to the TSC if someone from their company does not get elected or appointed by other means? Yes No Questions related to participation qualifications 16. Who should be allowed to run for a TSC position? All measurement criteria are effective as of the date the nomination process starts for the election: Anyone Any "Casual Community Member" (defined as anyone who has made at least one (1) measurable contributions during the previous six-month period, inclusive of code submissions, code reviews performed, wiki page edits or JIRA activities) Any “Active Community Member” (defined as anyone having made twenty (20) or more measurable contributions during the previous 12-month period, inclusive of code merged, code reviews performed, wiki page edits, or JIRA activities) Committers, Contributors and Reviewers only Anyone on the onap-discuss” and/or “onap-tsc” email list(s) Other [Please provide recommendation] 17. Who should be able to vote in a TSC election? All measurement criteria are effective as of the date the nomination process starts for the election: Any "Casual Community Member" (defined as anyone who has made at least one (1) measurable contributions during the previous six-month period, inclusive of code submissions, code reviews performed, wiki page edits or JIRA activities) Any “Active Community Member” (defined as anyone having made twenty (20) or more measurable contributions during the previous 12-month period, inclusive of code merged, code reviews performed, wiki page edits, or JIRA activities) Committers, Contributors and Reviewers only Anyone on the onap-discuss” and/or “onap-tsc” email list(s) Other [Please provide recommendation]
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
