Sorry about any confusion. Everyone should have received two copies. Please do 
not use the link provided in the onap-tsc-vote email.  Onap-tsc-vote was 
originally included as a recipient while I was doing work on the survey. I 
thought that I had removed it with a subsequent edit before I distributed it to 
everyone individually, but I guess that I didn't.

 

Thanks!

-kenny

 

From: Alla Goldner <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 12:31 PM
To: Kenny Paul <[email protected]>
Cc: onap-tsc <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] TSC Members Composition Survey RFC - Respond by 18:00 
Pacific time, May 7

 

While trying to access, I get message “you have already taken the survey”.

 

Best regards, 

 

Alla Goldner

 

Open Network Division 

Amdocs Technology

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 10:02 PM
To: onap-tsc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Members Composition Survey RFC - Respond by 18:00 
Pacific time, May 7

 

The survey has been emailed individually to all TSC Members from Surveymonkey. 
If you do not see it, please check your spam folder.

 

In the interest of transparency, I did reorder some of the questions in the 
survey and changed the attendance provisions to have a choice of 2, 3 or 4 
missed meetings. 

 

Thanks!

-kenny

 

From: Kenny Paul <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 6:05 PM
To: onap-tsc <[email protected]>
Cc: Kenny Paul <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Members Composition Survey RFC - Respond by 18:00 
Pacific time, May 7

 

Below is the survey that will be distributed to the TSC Members via Surveymonkey

DO NOT VOTE HERE - THIS IS NOT THE ACTUAL SURVEY –DEADLINE FOR INPUT HAS PASSED

 
When should the ONAP TSC move from “Startup” to “Steady State" operations at 
which point the TSC should be populated, not by Platinum Member designates, but 
instead by some other means, for which the TSC is responsible for defining?
As soon as the new method for populating the TSC is defined
After the Beijing Release
After the Casablanca Release
Other [Please specify time]
 

Questions related to the composition of the TSC during Steady State operations

 

2.                   How large should the TSC be?
10 or less
13
15
19
21
30
Other [Please specify a number or other quantitative measure]
 

3.                   Company Cap - How many members of the same company, or 
related companies (as defined in Section 4.4.1.4 of the ONAP Technical 
Community Document), should be allowed on the TSC at the same time?
1 per company
2 per company
3 per company
There should be no company-cap
Other [Please specify a number or other quantitative measure]
 

4.                   How many seats (if any) should be reserved for the ONAP 
Platinum Members of record from 2017?
None
≤ 5
≥ 6 and ≤ 10
≥ 11 and ≤ 15
≥ 16 and ≤ 19
20 (current level)
 

5.                   How many seats (if any) should be reserved for any LFN 
Platinum Members?
None
≤ 5
≥ 6 and ≤ 10
≥ 11 and ≤ 15
≥ 16 and ≤ 19
≥ 20 and ≤ 24
≥ 25 and ≤ 27
28 (current level)
Whatever membership number is permitted within the LFN Charter now (28) or in 
the future 
 

6.                   How many seats (if any) should be reserved for the top 
ranked code contributing companies?
none
≤ 5
≥ 6 and ≤ 10
≥ 11 and ≤ 15
≥ 16 and ≤ 19
≥ 20 and ≤ 24
≥ 25
 

7.                   How many seats (if any) should be reserved for operators?
none
3
5
8 (current)
Other [Please specify]
 

8.                   Should we try to ensure a mix of operators and vendors on 
the TSC?
Yes
No
 

9.                   If {Yes} to #8 above, what should the mix be?
At least 50% of the TSC should be from Operators
No less than 40% of the TSC should be from Operators
Other [Please specify a percentage or other criteria]
 

Questions Related to Attendance Provisions

 

10.               Should TSC Members be allowed to assign proxies with voting 
privileges
Yes
No
 

11.               If {Yes} to question #10

a.                   should an elected TSC Members who does not attend two 
consecutive meetings without a proxy in attendance be dropped from the quorum 
requirement?

1.       Yes

2.       No

 

b.                   should a non-elected or appointed TSC Members who does not 
attend two consecutive meetings without a proxy in attendance be dropped from 
the quorum requirement?

1.       Yes

2.       Yes and also forfeit their seat on the TSC

3.       No

 

12.               If {No} to question #10

a.                   should an elected TSC Members who does not attend two 
consecutive meetings be dropped from the quorum requirement?

1.       Yes

2.       No

 

b.                   should a non-elected or appointed TSC Members who does not 
attend two consecutive meetings be dropped from the quorum requirement?

1.       Yes

2.       Yes and also forfeit their seat on the TSC

3.       No

 

Questions applying to special provisions for this election cycle only

 

13.               Should ONAP Platinum Service Provider Members of record for 
2017 that joined the Program after the launch (specifically Turk Telekom, 
Verizon, and Vodafone), be allowed to keep an appointed representative on the 
TSC if someone from their company does not get elected or appointed by other 
means?
Yes
No
 

14.               Should all ONAP Platinum Service Provider Members of record 
for 2017 (AT&T, Bell Canada, China Mobile, China Telecom, Orange, Reliance Jio, 
Turk Telekom, Vodafone & Verizon) be allowed to appoint a representative to the 
TSC if someone from their company does not get elected or appointed by other 
means?
Yes
No
 

15.               Should all ONAP Platinum Members of record for 2017 (all of 
the existing TSC Companies + Verizon) be allowed to appoint a representative to 
the TSC if someone from their company does not get elected or appointed by 
other means?
Yes
No
 

Questions related to participation qualifications

 

16.               Who should be allowed to run for a TSC position? All 
measurement criteria are effective as of the date the nomination process starts 
for the election:
Anyone
Any "Casual Community Member" (defined as anyone who has made at least one (1) 
measurable contributions during the previous six-month period, inclusive of 
code submissions, code reviews performed, wiki page edits or JIRA activities)
Any “Active Community Member” (defined as anyone having made twenty (20) or 
more measurable contributions during the previous 12-month period, inclusive of 
code merged, code reviews performed, wiki page edits, or JIRA activities)
Committers, Contributors and Reviewers only
Anyone on the onap-discuss” and/or “onap-tsc” email list(s) 
Other [Please provide recommendation]
 

17.                Who should be able to vote in a TSC election? All 
measurement criteria are effective as of the date the nomination process starts 
for the election:
Any "Casual Community Member" (defined as anyone who has made at least one (1) 
measurable contributions during the previous six-month period, inclusive of 
code submissions, code reviews performed, wiki page edits or JIRA activities)
Any “Active Community Member” (defined as anyone having made twenty (20) or 
more measurable contributions during the previous 12-month period, inclusive of 
code merged, code reviews performed, wiki page edits, or JIRA activities)
Committers, Contributors and Reviewers only
Anyone on the onap-discuss” and/or “onap-tsc” email list(s) 
Other [Please provide recommendation]
 

 

 

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, 

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to