Hello ONAP TSC Members:

Based on the survey [0] that was conducted across both the TSC members and
the ONAP developer community at-large, the following general attributes for
this election have been identified:



*TSC Composition ​general ​recommendations from the Survey - Allowed to
run:  Active Contributors- Allowed to vote:  Active Contributors- Size of
TSC: 15 to 19- Composition: Ideally, 50% (9) or more Operators- Company
Cap: ​*​1 per company- In this election, ​have ​reserved spots for
Operators (AT&T, Bell, CMCC, China Telecom, Orange, Reliance Jio, Turk
Telecom, Verizon, Vodafone) - (A narrow majority in survey - Slide 14)-
Reserved spots for all ONAP Platinum members including Vendors was a split
vote (Slide 15)*

Given the above criteria, for this election, the following are 3 options
that could be considered:












*​Option 1 - TSC Cap 17, 18, or 19 (to target 50% operators)- At least one
person from each of the 9 Operators must run- Bios, pics, and “statement​s
of intent” up on the website for at least 1 week.- One big ranked vote
conducted via CIVS- Top ​ranked ​operators ​are identified​ (9 spots​ - one
per operator company)​- Remaining positions taken by top ranking
​individuals - one per company​ ​​Option 2​ - Each existing Platinum Member
of ONAP circa Jan. 2018  invited to appoint a TSC rep. (19 Members​)​ *
Causes issue for LFN Platinum Members that were not originally part of
ONAP​ as of January 1st ​Option 3​ - Each existing Platinum Member of LFN
invited to appoint a TSC rep. (27 Members) (adds ARM, Lenovo,
NEC/Netcracker, Qualcomm, Samsung, Suse, Red Hat, Juniper)- Fails the ~50%
Operator goal​, as well as desired size of TSC​​*

*Please​ consider these options and provide your thoughts, questions,
and/or alternatives to consider.​We need to close on this topic with a vote
by the end of June, so time is of the essence at this point.*

*​----​*

* From previous experience, capping TSC membership to one person per
company can cause the side-effect of company employees who would otherwise
be very qualified for the position choose *not* to run against another,
often more senior, person within their company.  This can produce a
sub-optimal result in TSC make-up.

[0]
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/25428910/TSC-Composition-Survey-Community.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1528486003000&api=v2

Thanks and best regards,

Phil.
-- 
Phil Robb
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to