Hi Catherine, Thank you for the email.
Based on the discussions in last edge-automation working group and also the slide deck, the working model is no different from current model. That is, output of this group will be fed as another input to various other subcommittees. So, there is no additional complexity. Group is only asking to increase the visibility in ONAP member companies as well as to other edge related open source projects/standard-bodies by making official ONAP entity. Also, group provided two options. 1. Making it subcommittee 2. Increase visibility by other means + creating coordinator position. Group preference is option 1. But, it is up to TSC to decide. Just for easy reference, I am adding the picture from the presentation deck. This is the working model now and continue to be working model even after making it as subcommittee. [cid:[email protected]] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 4:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Good morning Srini, Thank you for sharing the work that has been accomplished by the "Edge Automation" working group. One of our major ONAP Community challenges is the prioritization of our activities. I am concerned that the creation of a 6th subcommittee will increase the complexity we are already facing today to determine what can be accomplished on a release basis considering our development/testing capacity and then to deliver our commitments on time and quality. Have you explored the possibility that the "Edge Automation" working group could be part of one of the existing subcommittees i.e. Architecture or Use Case subcommittees even if dedicated sessions/task force activities are organized related to this topic ? Best regards Catherine From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Srini Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:31 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal Hi TSC, As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to identify ONAP requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge applications and propose those requirements as functional, closed loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees. This is being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis and continue to attract multiple stake holders. Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide visibility and visibility within the ONAP community. Formalization of the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow. Please see the proposal here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Edge-2BSub-2Dcommittee-2Bcreation-2Bproposal&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=T7fbofIwugI2fd1YCOsbebJVrEa-Ertu19evct8ETjY&e=> Presentation deck here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_28379482_ONAP-2Dedge-2Dproposal-2Dv1.pptx-3Fapi-3Dv2&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=GbUBODPE46f4yK_2eC4KoMSgYuiUlZEEZURVWR0_mNg&e=> Looking forward to your support. Thanks Srini -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3895): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3895 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
