On 10/12/2018 07:30 AM, Catherine LEFEVRE wrote:
>
> Good morning Srini,
>
>  
>
> Thank you for sharing the work that has been accomplished by the “Edge
> Automation” working group.
>
>  
>
> One of our major ONAP Community challenges is the prioritization of
> our activities.
>
> I am concerned that the creation of a 6th subcommittee will increase
> the complexity we are already facing today
>
> to determine what can be accomplished on a release basis considering
> our development/testing capacity and then to deliver our commitments
> on time and quality.
>
>  
>
> Have you explored the possibility that the “Edge Automation” working
> group could be part of one of the existing subcommittees i.e.
> Architecture or Use Case subcommittees
>
> even if dedicated sessions/task force activities are organized related
> to this topic ?
>
>  
>
+1 - what is fundamentally required to enable edge use cases with ONAP
services with minimal duplication of efforts / maximum re-use are
enabling architectural changes, not entirely new "thing" on the side.

As such, IMHO, this would be a better fit as an Architecture
subcommittee related task force.

Best regards,

Pasi
>
> Best regards
>
> Catherine
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Srini
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:31 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [onap-tsc] Edge Automation working group proposal
>
>  
>
> Hi TSC,
>
>  
>
> As you all know, Edge automation working group is formed in April/May
> of this year as ADHOC group. Its intention is to  identify ONAP
> requirements that arise from supporting various kinds of edges/edge
> applications  and propose those requirements as functional,  closed
> loop, security, architecture inputs to various subcommittees.  This is
> being co-chaired by Ramki and Raghu. This group meets on weekly basis
> and continue to attract multiple stake holders. 
>
>  
>
> Tomorrow, Ramki & Raghu are presenting a proposal to take Edge
> automation working group to next level to bring industry-wide
> visibility and visibility within the ONAP community.  Formalization of
> the group in ONAP charter is the step the group wants to propose tomorrow.
>
>  
>
> Please see the proposal here: 
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Edge+Sub-committee+creation+proposal
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Edge-2BSub-2Dcommittee-2Bcreation-2Bproposal&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=T7fbofIwugI2fd1YCOsbebJVrEa-Ertu19evct8ETjY&e=>
>
> Presentation deck here:
>  
> https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/28379482/ONAP-edge-proposal-v1.pptx?api=v2
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_28379482_ONAP-2Dedge-2Dproposal-2Dv1.pptx-3Fapi-3Dv2&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=aowlSSV3c29kMC_TzkQzurCs88DAw9YnFDMNS8PyBtk&s=GbUBODPE46f4yK_2eC4KoMSgYuiUlZEEZURVWR0_mNg&e=>
>
>  
>
> Looking forward to your support.
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Srini
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3896): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3896
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27216848/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to