This reply is targeted at the TSC Members more than anything else.

 

I am unsure why in ONAP we have a perceived need to continually create new
repos within a project with the exact same set of committers over and over
This isn't behavior typically seen in other OSS projects.  As I mentioned in
Paris, this is pretty much worse practice
<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Repository+Management+FAQ?preview=/5128260
1/51282604/repo%20growth.png> .  The issue with repo proliferation seems to
be pretty pervasive My only guess that this behavior may be a holdover from
a closed source development model.

 

In January we had 250 active repos and now we have 282.  That is a rate of
more than one new repo per week. 

 

Bottom line, repos aren't free. Each one means incremental ongoing work for
release engineering, incremental ongoing maintenance and the more repos a
project has the more difficult it becomes for someone new to onboard to that
project, effectively strangling contributor diversity.  

 

I believe y'all should be trying to get a better understanding of why we
need to add a repo a week. 

 

-kenny

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ofir
Sonsino
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 4:07 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: 'Shalom Berman' <[email protected]>; 'Avi Gaffa'
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] New SDC repositories request

 

Hi Catherine,

 

Thank you for replying.

 

You're right we can't guarantee it will be part of Frankfurt release at this
stage, but I'd still like to allow the teams to make their contribution
meanwhile.

Giving the code will be delivered to dedicated repositories, we'll be able
to choose whether to include the artifacts in Frankfurt release, or exclude
them if there's a need to.

 

I'm looking forward to architecture subcommittee feedback;

@Arc, please note this is more about internal SDC rather than cross ONAP
architecture.

 

@Kenny, committers should be same as main SDC repository:

 <https://git.onap.org/sdc/tree/INFO.yaml>
https://git.onap.org/sdc/tree/INFO.yaml

 

Best regards,

Ofir

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2019 7:19 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Cc: 'Shalom Berman' <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; 'Avi
Gaffa' <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] New SDC repositories request

 

SDC already has 21 repos.  Are the permissions on the ones proposed for a
different set of committers than the others? 

-kenny

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf Of
Catherine LEFEVRE
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2019 12:17 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Cc: Shalom Berman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; Avi
Gaffa <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] New SDC repositories request

 

Good morning Ofir,

 

At this stage, we cannot really confirm that this feature will be part or
not of the Frankfurt release.

Nevertheless, looking at the feature's details, it seems to be required to
fix the DB synchronization issue

 

Can we get the buying from the ONAP Architecture Team?

 

Many thanks and regards

Catherine

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sonsino, Ofir
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 3:42 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Cc: Shalom Berman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; Avi
Gaffa <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: [onap-tsc] New SDC repositories request

 

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference  <http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html>
http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

Dear TSC,

 

I'd like to ask for your approval for creating 2 SDC repositories as follow:

*       sdc/type-management
*       sdc/type-management-plugin

 

In favor of the type management feature in SDC that is detailed here:
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_
DW_SDC-2BType-2BManagement&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=c31OYuaPawMl_
ySS_voXJQ&m=fnXTE1PpmK9FI5TBB5R4h7V_FjaLCI4WPnA54msuSpo&s=3j_FIAFC26lTEBqmMX
0KowNbjENS-NvBtiQeRPlKOJA&e=>
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/SDC+Type+Management

This to be a part of SDC Frankfurt release.

 

Thanks,

 

Ofir Sonsino

Project Technical Lead, SDC

AT&T Network Application Development . NetCom  

Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago

...........................................................................

Office: +972 (3) 5451417

Mobile: +972 (52) 4377782

E-mail:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#5188): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/5188
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32192176/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to