Re: [Onap-arc] [onap-tsc] New SDC repositories request

Mon, 08 Jul 2019 01:42:24 -0700 


On 08.07.2019 10:20, Sylvain Desbureaux via Lists.Onap.Org wrote:
> Hello Kenny,
> 
> If I may I think that “micro” repos are a better way to handle code in a 
> CI/CD world. Let’s take two examples:
> 
>   * SO: SO has (roughly) one project into ONAP git but delivers 13
>     containers. That means that 1 code change that should affect only
>     one of the containers will rebuild the 13 containers so it’s
>     __hard__ to debug at the end.
>   * SDC: SDC has 21 repos (if I’m not mistaken) and delivers 13
>     containers also. That mean that 1 code change that should affect
>     only one of the containers __should__ rebuild 1 containers. I assume
>     that some repos could be merged together but not that much IMHO.
> 
> So for me a good practice is:
> 
>   * This “folder” / code produce 1 container àit should be a project
>     into gerrit
>   * This “folder” / code is a common foundation for several containers
>     àit should be a project into gerrit and we should have a __clear__
>     (automated) policy on how to upgrade the upstream components.

I strongly agree with your point but I'd like to also add that in order 
to fully benefit from multiple repo workflow we should start using 
proper tags in gerrit (Depends-On:) if we are doing changes that affect 
other repos and learn our CI/CD system to properly interpret that to 
avoid fake failures in number of reviews...

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Opasiak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#5191): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/5191
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32389899/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-























					Reply via email to