Hi,
even through I'm not a TSC I'd like to let you know my feedback.
On 12.11.2019 17:06, Perala, Timo (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
Hello,
I would like to understand first
1) What’s the current cost and what is the savings potential e.g. if we
implement policy along the lines outlined below.
2) What’s the volume split between projects/TSC & SubCs/DDFs.
3) Assuming the TSC & SubC meeting recordings and DDF recordings
constitute minority, I have inclination to keep them longer (e.g.
indefinitely to start with).
4) Project recordings to stay there for the full release. I guess that
would in practice mean 6 moths + small delta.
I support Timo's point of view. In general I believe that we should bind
the recording lifecycle to ONAP release cadence not the absolute time.
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Opasiak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#5614): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/5614
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/54381323/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
