I agree with
Rich. According to a Washington Post/ABC News poll made public today, the
vast majority of Americans agree with the two of us. The vast majority
(over 85%) of Americans also seem to have little problem with GWBs planned
possible use of military tribunals.
It is good that there
are those among us who are concerned about misuse of these tribunals.
Watchdogs are a good thing, but their barking is not always
meaningful. Time will tell.
Glen Schumann -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rich Pflughoeft (cPMT) Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Winona] Military Tribunals While
I appreciate the concern that many have expressed regarding this issue, I'm not
convinced that everyone believes it to be ridiculous to consider
the acts of terrorism against our country to be an act of war.
I
realize that there are 'legal definitions' to which I am probably ignorant. What
I do know is that our country is faced with coordinated and sophisticated
attacks at our citizens. Attacks meant to kill thousands at a time. Perhaps
millions. Maybe this doesn't meet everyone's definition of war. It does meet
mine.
Rich
Pflughoeft
|
- [Winona] Military Tribunals Duane M. Peterson
- [Winona] Military Tribunals Dwayne Voegeli
- RE: [Winona] Military Tribunals Rich Pflughoeft \(cPMT\)
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Glen & Diane Schumann
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Terry Angst
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Duane M. Peterson
- [Winona] Military Tribunals Phil Carlson
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Kathy Seifert
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Duane M. Peterson
- RE: [Winona] Military Tribunals Rich Pflughoeft \(cPMT\)
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals DeanLanz
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals DeanLanz