The problem I have with your definition of war is
that I don't know where you will draw the line. Our concern needs to be
how will we handle similar events in the future. The constitution states
that only the Congress can declare war. There is also the principle that
we can defend ourselves from attack without an official declaration. We
have a history of loosely defining "war" or trying to conduct a war without
calling it a war. We have also conducted wars on drugs, poverty, and many
other things. I think that the temptation to call things a war comes from
the feeling that calling something a war will mobilize public opinion in favor
of the policy that congress and administrations wish to adopt to tackle the
problem.
That would be harmless if it did not implicate
other constitutional protections. We have in the past and are now
contemplating the conduct of secret trials using secret evidence. Maybe it
won't actually happen, but the devil is in the details.
|
- [Winona] Military Tribunals Duane M. Peterson
- [Winona] Military Tribunals Dwayne Voegeli
- RE: [Winona] Military Tribunals Rich Pflughoeft \(cPMT\)
- RE: [Winona] Military Tribunals Glen & Diane Schumann
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Terry Angst
- [Winona] Military Tribunals Duane M. Peterson
- [Winona] Military Tribunals Phil Carlson
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Kathy Seifert
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals Duane M. Peterson
- RE: [Winona] Military Tribunals Rich Pflughoeft \(cPMT\)
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals DeanLanz
- Re: [Winona] Military Tribunals DeanLanz