On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:17:30 +0200, Martin Hollmichel <[email protected]> wrote:
On 06/15/2011 05:00 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:

[...]
As far as I'm concerned that would be fine for dmake. I never liked to
have it in the OOo code base and I know that others would welcome to
have it separated too.
As there are no runtime dependencies to any OOo code I'd prefer to have dmake elsewhere (SF, github, etc) to make clear that dmake can be used by any other project, re-license the OOo specific and Oracle copyrighted
dmake (*.mk, etc) files to AL2.0 within the OOo-tree (solenv),

Martin

I think the Apache - Google code site seems appropriate. Also,
preserving the history from the repository would be good.

FWIW, Debian carries something called dmake-4.12, no idea if it's
related or not.

Pedro.


Reply via email to