On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:35, Mathias Bauer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15.06.2011 22:59, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 16:16, Pedro Giffuni<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:45:08 -0700, Andy Brown<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> ... >>>> >>>> From the Description of dmake 1:4.12-2 "make utility used to build >>>> OpenOffice.org" in Ubuntu's Package Manager. It would seem that is >>>> all that it is used for. >>> >>> Thanks for checking Andy! >>> >>> FreeBSD also has it and it's used to build 9 packages. >>> >>> >>> http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_build&method=match&query=dmake&num=10&orderby=category&orderbyupdown=asc&search=Search >>> >>> I will see if the FreeBSD port needs updating but I guess there's no >>> need to start a repository for dmake unless we want to have some control >>> over it (not likely). >> >> Would there be any benefit to dropping dmake in favor of more >> readily-available build tools? > > That's already going on. We startet a move to GNU Make, but not all our code > modules have been converted to it. And as we already discussed, we don't > want to convert the rest before we can get the first build of OOo@Apache.
Great! And I'm behind on my threads. Hadn't see the "hold on for a bit" part :-) ... Thanks. Cheers, -g
