Hi Ross, *,
Am 16.06.2011 14:55, schrieb Ross Gardler:
On 16/06/2011 13:47, Manfred A. Reiter wrote:
Hi Sam, *,
2011/6/16 Sam Ruby<[email protected]>:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:47 AM,
IngridvdM<[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
As long as we're talking about people like us. ;-)
But: what's with an enduser in Nagano, japan or an enduser in
Chapéco, Brasil?
At some point it will make sense to create an ooo-user@ mailing list.
As Sam says below, new contact points can be created if/when they are
needed.
[...]
Is it intended from NewOOo to deliver final products to the market?
If yes,
than IMHO we should think *right now*
about an infrastructure for these parts of the project.
else ...
Or do you think that there are too many unstability still in the
process?
Generally the ASF approach is to *only* create additional channels
when the noise in the existing channels is too high.
right for a project which starts from scratch
We are nowhere near that point yet.
really?
There a millions of installations around the world, right now.
... and ... behind ... the grant of the code Apache received a lot of
"clients", ;-)
in different countries, with different culture and different languages.
sorry for talking about self-evident things, but they must be obseved
At this point of incubation users are a key part of the development
process for this project.
Yes and *they are* for more than 10 years.
All these users don't disappear while sourcecode is going from Oracle to
Apache.
For example, how can we answer your question above without
understanding what both the project members and its users want?
Nevertheless: The earlier you start these national projects, the more
uncertainty is removed from the market.
You don't need a separate contact point to start working on these issues.
Could you please explain that point?
[...]
cheers
M.
