On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Christian Lippka <[email protected]> wrote:
> As a developer I think we can learn a lot from the LO people in terms of > creating > a user feeling. I think a mistake from OOo was to actually spend more time > coding > and less time community building. > umm.... waiting for a drumroll anytime soon. > > Am 22.06.2011 00:20, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: > > Hi Mathias, >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Mathias Bauer<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 21.06.2011 23:01, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Mathias Bauer<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> Not really. It's mainly about the shrinking of the LO Windows download >>>>> size >>>>> (that BTW still is bigger than the download size of OOo). >>>>> >>>> But includes *all* languages, as opposed to one single language. >>>> (it doesn't include help though, that is in an extra package, if not >>>> installed you'll get the help online in your browser). >>>> >>>> So don't start comparing apples and oranges. >>>> >>> <sigh> I was not the one who started that nonsense discussion.</sigh> >>> >> But you were the one who made that nonsense statement. Live with it. >> >> And I still fail to see how that related to performance. >>> >> It is not. Only thing that is related to size is the amount of data >> needed to read from disk and how much memory that useless data uses. >> But no, I don't know whether that accounts to performance at all, and >> as I'm not using windows myself, I don't care either. Or otherwise >> put: No idea whether the windows9x compatibility stuff that was >> removed for example was ifdef 0 ed already, or whether it ended up in >> the compiled result.. >> But just because the one thing doesn't have anything to do with the >> other, doesn't make that other part irrelevant. >> >> All I asked for is to not compare apples with oranges. Not more, not less. >> So many b*t is written and picked up by others, so don't start it here. >> >> Can we now go back to real work again? >>> >> Well, consider me as observer only/ignore me, I surely won't hinder >> you from doing your work. But I surely won't just accept any nonsense >> written here without commenting. >> >> (as for performance: I myself didn't bother to compare for myself, but >> users report that LO feels faster for them, so they are happy, and >> that's what counts in the end) >> >> ciao >> Christian >> >> > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
