I remember year 2007, MS Office 2007 and Red Office (last based on OOo). Super UI requested by this external community starting new time for OOo -> death. OOo haven't enath peaople in developers community to release this new ideas. We haven't right DOC support (for example big files with a lot of images). We need to select new goals and release it as soon as possible. New organization should have modern ideas and mechanism to that.

On 22.06.2011 00:30, Christian Lippka wrote:
As a developer I think we can learn a lot from the LO people in terms of creating a user feeling. I think a mistake from OOo was to actually spend more time coding
and less time community building.

Am 22.06.2011 00:20, schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
Hi Mathias,

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Mathias Bauer<[email protected]> wrote:
On 21.06.2011 23:01, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Mathias Bauer<[email protected]>
  wrote:
[...]
Not really. It's mainly about the shrinking of the LO Windows download
size
(that BTW still is bigger than the download size of OOo).
But includes *all* languages, as opposed to one single language.
(it doesn't include help though, that is in an extra package, if not
installed you'll get the help online in your browser).

So don't start comparing apples and oranges.
<sigh>  I was not the one who started that nonsense discussion.</sigh>
But you were the one who made that nonsense statement. Live with it.

And I still fail to see how that related to performance.
It is not. Only thing that is related to size is the amount of data
needed to read from disk and how much memory that useless data uses.
But no, I don't know whether that accounts to performance at all, and
as I'm not using windows myself, I don't care either. Or otherwise
put: No idea whether the windows9x compatibility stuff that was
removed for example was ifdef 0 ed already, or whether it ended up in
the compiled result..
But just because the one thing doesn't have anything to do with the
other, doesn't make that other part irrelevant.

All I asked for is to not compare apples with oranges. Not more, not less.
So many b*t is written and picked up by others, so don't start it here.

Can we now go back to real work again?
Well, consider me as observer only/ignore me, I surely won't hinder
you from doing your work. But I surely won't just accept any nonsense
written here without commenting.

(as for performance: I myself didn't bother to compare for myself, but
users report that LO feels faster for them, so they are happy, and
that's what counts in the end)

ciao
Christian



Reply via email to