Am 07/01/2011 05:23 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Alexandro Colorado<[email protected]>wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Marcus (OOo)<[email protected]>wrote:
Am 07/01/2011 04:56 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Marcus (OOo)<[email protected]>
wrote:
Am 06/30/2011 04:03 AM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Marcus (OOo)<[email protected]>
wrote:
Sorry, it seems I wasn't clear enough.
I don't think about how to name directories and files in the SVN repo
itself. Sure we can stick with the schema like it is done in other
projects.
It's more a general thing how to present trunk and branches to the
outside.
E.g., when we release bits we have to make clear into which direction
they
point. It's a difference if we use a name like "branch 3.4.x" or tell
the
people it's "OOO 3.4.0" or maybe "AOOO 3.4.0".
So, I don't think that a trailing 0 is not ? when it is the 3.4.0
release.
And the OOO is still necessary to show it's from our project. Of
course
it
could be "AOOO" or whatever we will agree to.
How to name the release files is another thing. There should be a
clear
structure to keep it simple and straight for scripts. But this is a
topic
for later.
I hope it's more clear now. ;-)
My bad also misconstruct the naming conversation. Well we used to
have
different branches each with a name OOODEV was for the always
development
branch and OOO for the actual release branches.
I don't remember OOODEV as a name somewhere.
So usually they got rid of the dots for clarity, and added a m for
milestone:
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/
and DEV:
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/dev_index.html
I'm sorry but I don't understand what you want to express with the both
links. Please can you describe it in other words?
I am pointing you to the naming of the branches and their dinamics. Isn't
that what you were addressing at first? Not sure what you mean by not
Yes, that's right.
remembering OOODEV as a name, after you saw the link with the OOODEV
branch.
There is no OOODEV on the webpage. It's speaking about DEV and OOO
milestones.
You sure? there is the unstable codeline:
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/dev_index.html#dev300
You dont get the OOO till the actual filename download. I guess it was
getting long.
If you go to the latest DEV300m106
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/DEV300m106_snapshot.html
you'll see:
This snapshot build will install as OOo-Dev 3.4.
Ah, you mean the product name that is the filename, too. I wasn't away
of that you meant this. As stated elsewhere in this thread choosing the
right filenames can be done later.
Marcus
