I'd go with the shorter URL, and that title looks great.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 19:16, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > Then the choices are: > > blogs.apache.org/openofficeorg > or > blogs.apache.org/ooo > > The title ought to be "Apache OpenOffice.org (incubating)", correct? > > Regards, > Dave > > On Jul 8, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Danese Cooper wrote: > >> It isn't just a matter of who gets more hits on Google. In 2000, the >> OpenOffice name was not trademarkable worldwide (and probably still is not) >> without the .org. OTOH, the ASF doesn't normally seek to register all it's >> trademarks worldwide because of cost (in the US, first use of a mark is >> significant enough)...but if Oracle is transferring it's trademarks to the >> ASF (and if it's the worldwide trademark, then it's worth about $350,000 >> USD), then we're back to dealing with the .org, I'm afraid. >> >> Danese >> >> Kay Shenk wrote: >> >> -Yeah, once upon a time, when you did a search on "Open Office", the *other* >> office suite, whoever owned this brand, came up (like maybe 6+ years ago). >> Now it doesn't, but we should ascertain the status or history of this before >> changing the product/brand name I think, just to be safe. > >
