On 09/07/11 12:21, Pavel Janík wrote:
Why? Out of the folk on the OOo forum who expressed an opinion to me, no one 
liked it. It was a perpetual reminder that the product couldn't be called what 
they really wanted it to be called: OpenOffice. I greatly prefer Apache 
OpenOffice to Apache OpenOffice.org.
The product and the project WAS OpenOffice.org.
Yes, I know.

If we want to change it, then why not directly Apache Office?

I'd say that Apache OpenOffice had stronger and more obvious ties to the older project, and it was obvious it wasn't a new (distinct) office offering from Apache.

Dave.

Reply via email to