So where are we with this? The last I heard, the proposal was to store an archival version of the Hg repositories at apache-extras [1] and then to check the tip into SVN.
Were there any objections to this approach? Yes, I know it is not ideal. But ideal doesn't seem to be working very well right now ;-) I suppose one remaining thing to close on would be the repository structure. Do we want to merge the translation and the code repositories into one? Keep them as separate paths in the same repository? Or have them in separate repositories? This is an issue for both the tip checkin into SVN as well as the Hg archive. -Rob [1] http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo/ On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Malte Timmermann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 28.07.2011 12:37, Eike Rathke wrote: >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> On Thursday, 2011-07-28 00:41:40 -0400, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> 1) import just the OOO340 tip into svn >>> 2) move all the Hg repositories over to apache-extras.org. That >>> supports Hg and it supports "any OSI license". We can indefinitely >>> retain history there without it being "part of" our ASF project. >> >> +1 > > Yes - sounds good! :) > > Malte. >
