Am 01.08.2011 23:31, schrieb Eike Rathke:
The Hg archive should simply replicate the current structure at OOo,
also for ease of adding in pending CWSs as branches, so a separate l10n
repository.
Another good argument to separate l10n from trunk was given in an
earlier thread: This way it is easier for developers to get only what
they will need usually and spare the extra time and space.
I think this is a good argument and I wonder whether we shouldn't be
prepared to identify more such stuff - for example the binfilter.
So what I would like to consider is whether we should go with a
structure like:
ooo/trunk/...
ooo/extras/l10n/...
(ooo/extras/binfilter/... as possibility to add later)
instead of:
ooo/trunk/...
ooo/l10n/...
The name extras is of course open to discuss also.
Opinions?
Ingrid
For SVN I think l10n as sibling to trunk would be best.
Eike
