2011/8/3 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2011/8/2 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Andy Brown <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> I poked around and found this page: > >> > >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Special:Statistics > >> > >> This lists some additional roles (with counts) > >> > >> Administrators (26) > >> Bureaucrats (4) > >> Editors (20) > >> Reviewers (5) > >> > >> Those are in addition to 35,020 User accounts. > >> > >> Curiously, it reports only 5 of the 35,020 users as having been active > >> in the past 7 days. > >> > > > > did you poked around 1 year ago as well? > > do you have an explanation, why these numbers are slowing down? > > > > with the statistic above you don't increase the credibility ... > > > > or > > > > http://www.statistik.baden-wuerttemberg.de/Veroeffentl/Monatshefte/essay.asp?xYear=2004&xMonth=11&eNr=11 > >
1. did you read the first sentence in the link above? more or less - Churchill: "I only belive in statistics, which I have mainpulated myself." or "the only statistics you can trust are those you falsified yourself" > One of the biggest mistakes I made when I moved into my house was to ... ... [fairy-tail deleted] > > With the wiki, if we really want to allow anyone to have write access > to it, then we really need to be committed to fight the weeds, which > in the case of wikis would be spam, low quality content, edit wars, > etc. If we can re-establish the community participation level the way > it was a year ago, then great. It would have a chance of success. > But right now I see almost no activity on the wiki. 35,000 user > accounts, but no users. If this doesn't change, the weeds will surely > win. > 2. May be, my english is not good enough to understand, wheather your your response answers my questions. M.
