On 03/08/11 13:57, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andre Schnabel<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Rob,
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Von: Rob Weir<[email protected]>
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Manfred A. Reiter<[email protected]>
wrote:
2011/8/3 Rob Weir<[email protected]>
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter<[email protected]>
wrote:
2011/8/2 Rob Weir<[email protected]>
....
Curiously, it reports only 5 of the 35,020 users as having been
active
in the past 7 days.
did you poked around 1 year ago as well?
do you have an explanation, why these numbers are slowing down?
...
2. May be, my english is not good enough to understand, wheather your
your response answers my questions.
If you have an unanswered question, please restate it,
It's still in the quoted mail.
perhaps
rephrase if you think it was originally misunderstood.
Afaics there is nothing to be misunderstood in the (two) question(s).
Ah. OK. He was asking for speculation on why the traffic is less now
than a year ago. Impossible to say, since I can't find any data on
what the traffic actually was a year ago. One way to back speculation
with facts would be to get a log of edits from last year, gather the
editors who were most active then, and contact them with a set of
survey questions.
Rob, I think that I covered this point to some degree in an earlier post
today :-) //Terry
