On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andre Schnabel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Von: Rob Weir <[email protected]> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Manfred A. Reiter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > 2011/8/3 Rob Weir <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > 2011/8/2 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > .... >> >> >> >> >> >> Curiously, it reports only 5 of the 35,020 users as having been >> active >> >> >> in the past 7 days. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > did you poked around 1 year ago as well? >> >> > do you have an explanation, why these numbers are slowing down? >> >> > > ... >> > >> > 2. May be, my english is not good enough to understand, wheather your >> > your response answers my questions. >> > >> >> If you have an unanswered question, please restate it, > > > It's still in the quoted mail. > >> perhaps >> rephrase if you think it was originally misunderstood. > > Afaics there is nothing to be misunderstood in the (two) question(s). >
Ah. OK. He was asking for speculation on why the traffic is less now than a year ago. Impossible to say, since I can't find any data on what the traffic actually was a year ago. One way to back speculation with facts would be to get a log of edits from last year, gather the editors who were most active then, and contact them with a set of survey questions. > André >
