On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Andre Schnabel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rob, > >> Von: Rob Weir <[email protected]> > >> >> Sorry, replacing Andre's speculation with your speculation is not the >> same as introducing facts. > > I did not do any speculation in my mail, the only thing I did was > to quote (again) Manfred's questions (that you did not see before). > > A simple: > - no I did not poke the data from a year ago > and > - no I will not speculations why access to OOo wiki is increasing or > decreasing > > would have been sufficient answers. > > > There is no need to try to find something in my mails what I didn't actually > write. >
Andre, perhaps you forgot, but you did speculate on this earlier in the thread, when you wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Andre Schnabel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Von: Rob Weir <[email protected]> > >> > We already have two separate wikis, one that the community uses and one >> that requires committers to make the changes. I notice the second one is >> not getting much activity. >> > >> >> And I'm not seeing a lot of activity at the OpenOffice.org wiki either: >> >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&from=20110702130619&days=30&limit=500 >> >> What does that prove? > > > that OpenOffice.org is a project with (still) a strong name but without > community contributions? > > scnr > > André > > regards, > > André > > >
