Dave, I'm not sure what you are referring to. You added a number of locations where?
-----Original Message----- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 12:02 To: [email protected] Cc: 'Peter Junge'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Proposal] Give the BHV publishing house in Kaarst/Germany the permission to use the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: [ ... ] > HMMM... > > Also, and this is probably not the right time for this (especially for > OpenOffice.org 3.3), we might want to come up with a request (or > requirement?) that publishers include a link to locations under our support > where current information, updates, and support about OpenOffice.org can be > found. (That would be separate from links the publisher might provide for > updates on their book and on the 10,000+ templates that are provided on the > DVD.) > > We also, now that I think about it, need to provide information in our > distros and maybe for use in print, about the availability of source code for > a specific release and for information on source code for other releases, > including the latest. > > [I think I will flag these two as notes-to-self for something we need to pay > attention to. The specific source-code-availability requirement may not be > so strict under ALv2 and Apache practice, in contrast with the LGPL > requirement. It seems like a great thing to perpetuate, regardless. It is > another reason to keep the openoffice.org domain name operating because of > linking from material in print as well as on-line.] I have added a number of the locations that show the Oracle OOo versions of these policies in our podling's port of the OOo website. Anyone should feel free to start adapting these properly. I don't have time to get deeply engrossed in these details. Regards, Dave [ ... ]
