looks good, nothing to add really. Maybe some discussions with Terry about the wiki migration but that is included on one of the points as "infrastructure".
I most point out there are many disucssions that are still idle and we dont have a referrence anymore since Oracle shutdown some of these servers including, QUASTE-TCM, QATrack, EIS, OpenGrok, etc. Extensions are intermitent with every other weekend going off. On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org>wrote: > I have posted a draft for review on the wiki and below. Changes and > improvements can be made on the Wiki page. If you propose to modify the > page, please make it known here so that collisions can be avoided. > > Suggestions here will be selectively incorporated into the Wiki page. The > deadline is Wednesday, 2011-09-14. > > - Dennis > > *** INITIAL DRAFT BEING REVIEWED BY PODLING: > > * OpenOffice.org entered incubation 2011-06-13. > > OpenOffice.org is an open-source, office-document productivity suite > providing six productivity applications based around the OpenDocument Format > (ODF). OpenOffice.org is released on multiple platforms. Its localizations > support 110 languages worldwide. > > * Most important to address > > 1) Migration of the legacy OpenOffice.org website's content and services to > Apache infrastructure, including defect tracking, wiki, forums, mailing > lists, and cross-service registration using customized software not already > supported by Apache projects and infrastructure. Successful negotiation of > governance migration of user-supported services brought under incubation. > > 2) Completion of the IP-review portions of the incubation checklist, which > will require getting an amended SGA from Oracle to cover additional source > files; scrubbing of incompatible notices from SGA-licensed code and > resolving provenance of other existing materials being migrated. > > 3) A Successful Podling Release > > * Issues for IPMC or ASF Board Awareness > > The code base pulled over from OpenOffice.org is undergoing development > while incompatible notices remain on the granted code. This is separate > from the scrubbing of dependencies on incompatibly-licensed material. > RECOMMENDATION: Continue OpenOffice monthly reporting for another quarter > while IP cleanup is pending. > > The current committers are not equipped to fully resource the migration of > OpenOffice.org sites and services under Apache OOo incubation. Preservation > of the Wiki is in doubt because of resource and support limitations. > Cutover of mailing-list and registration/forwarding systems is not resourced > at all. The ability to make anticipatory modifications of OpenOffice.org in > preparation for staging is also limited, with volunteer support and > administration of the live system possibly eroding. > > Discussions with contributors of current user-oriented documentation have > broken off; it is likely that the status quo will continue to be with > user-guide contributions made separately and under licenses the authors > prefer. This is not an immediate issue unless replacement with ALv2 > licensed materials is urgent. Having updated user-guides reflecting details > and features of future Apache releases is worrisome. > > * Community development progress > > As of 2011-09-12 there are 72 committers, with 55 on the PPMC, up from 71 > and 52 at last report. Eleven initial committers have failed to submit > iCLAs and are out of communication. > > Discussion is underway with the operators of the existing OpenOffice.org > forums for migration of the forums into incubation, with adjustment of > governance to provide appropriate PPMC and Foundation oversight. > > An ooo-user incubator mailing list has begun, and there are few > user-oriented posts and requests so far; any preservation, migration, or > replacement of other lists remains to be resolved. A Japanese-language ooo- > incubator list is starting. > > A "Building OpenOffice.org for Linux" hackfest was announced on the project > blog and carried out over the Internet in the first full week of September. > > * Project development progress > > The OpenOffice.org trademarks have been transferred to Apache. The > OpenOffice.org domain-name registrations are being transferred to Apache. > > The OpenOffice.org Issue Tracking Bugzilla has been moth-balled as > read-only and an Apache Bugzilla established for continuation of Issue > Tracking under the podling. > > The main code base has been transferred to Apache SVN and is being actively > tested and modified. Merging of additional work spaces from OpenOffice.org, > and preservation of versioning history is being pursued. The current effort > is focused on successful build of a counterpart of the last complete build > at OpenOffice.org. > > Test configurations of the OpenOffice.org forum system and the > OpenOffice.org Wiki have been brought up on Apache infrastructure fixtures. > Cutover of the forum system is anticipated as part of the OpenOffice.org > migration. Other services may languish for lack of podling resources. > > Detailed planning continues on public wiki: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 07:33 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2011 ( > ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org) > > I've started pulling together a skeleton by reviewing the July/August > reports and accomplishments since. > > When I have something on the wiki at > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2011 I will put an update on the > list and request review. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: no-re...@apache.org [mailto:no-re...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 07:00 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2011 ( > ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org) > > Dear OpenOffice.org Developers, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your > quarterly > board report. > > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 September 2011, 10 am Pacific. > The report > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The > Incubator PMC > requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to > allow > sufficient time for review. > > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, > and > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you > should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting. > > Thanks, > > The Apache Incubator PMC > > Submitting your Report > ---------------------- > > Your report should contain the following: > > * Your project name > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the > project > or necessarily of its field > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards > graduation. > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be > aware of > * How has the community developed since the last report > * How has the project developed since the last report. > > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2011 > > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this > page is > created from a template. > > Mentors > ------- > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator > PMC. > > Incubator PMC > > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
