On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Donald Whytock <dwhyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to suggest this be more detailed, so it's clear where the > problems are. That way it's easier to determine what ASF can provide > that isn't provided already. > >>>> The current committers are not equipped to fully resource the migration of >>>> OpenOffice.org sites and services under Apache OOo incubation. > > Does "current committers" refer to people working on the Oracle site, > or the current pool of committers in the podling? > > Does "resource" mean supply time, gain access, provide equipment, have skill? >
"Resource" as a verb is American English bureaucratic language for, "to assign resources to a task". >>>> Preservation of the Wiki is in doubt because of resource and support >>>> limitations. > > Is this preservation of the wiki in its current form because the > Oracle servers are going away? Preservation of the wiki data because > it's not being done in a timely manner? > >>>> Cutover of mailing-list and registration/forwarding systems >>>> is not resourced at all. > > "Resourced" as in people designated/volunteering to do it, no > comparable Apache facility, no plan, no access? > >>>> The ability to make anticipatory modifications >>>> of OpenOffice.org in preparation for staging is also limited, with >>>> volunteer support and administration of the live system possibly eroding. > > Specific problems with access, skill level, available people, timetable? > > Am I overestimating what has to be in a podling report? > > Don >
