Excellent stuff, and definitely needed.
On 10/25/2011 10:44 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/25/2011 04:31 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
--- On Tue, 10/25/11, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org> wrote:
...snip...
2) Do we have a strong preference for whether patches are
submitted to
the ooo-dev list or via Bugzilla? Or are both
acceptable?
Both are acceptable and are covered by clause 5 of the
AL2. I personally prefer bugzilla because the list
sometimes filters patches.
+1
IMHO BZ seems to be the more logical part to "host" patches. Even when
knowing the famous sentence "If it doesn't happen on the list, ...". ;-)
When the Dev would write a short mail to the list with a link to the BZ
issue, it would be perfect.
+1 for encouraging Bugzilla patches, since once the project is
comfortable with the BZ categories, etc. it's easier to track items.
See Also: ooo-iss...@incubator.apache.org, which is a publicly archived
mailing list that all BZ status changes are mirrored to - very helpful
if folks want to track bugs. Some projects have that stuff come to the
dev@ list, but here it's a separate issues@ list.
Archives are at both:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-issues/
http://ooo.markmail.org/search/bugzilla+list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Eooo-issues
- Shane
