Hi, Rob Weir wrote on 2011-10-25 18:26:
It is mind boggling that we're having a discussion about an important topic -- how we handle security vulnerabilities -- and the discussion is being led based entirely on non-security considerations, without hardly a mention of users, and instead dwelling on one party's paranoia. This does not make sense.
if you want, I can perfectly write you paragraphs about why TDF, why FrODeV or why any other entity is trustworthy and/or neutral. Again, this doesn't lead to anywhere in this case.
Name me one argument that speaks against my proposal, other than personal feelings. Otherwise I'm not wasting my time anymore with discussing that topic here, it really leads to nowhere.
I made a proposal on how to have neutral grounds, and if all parties are involved, trust should be given as well. Users will benefit. Everyone happy. Easy, isn't it?
Florian -- Florian Effenberger <[email protected]> Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
