-1 to a [VOTE] conducted on the ooo-marketing list if it is expected to be a binding agreement of the project.
That would require the PPMC to all subscribe and it would require anyone who is concerned with only this issue to subscribe here. There is one place to "speak to the PPMC" in public, and it is ooo-dev. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 08:32 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Process for deciding on branding strategy for our first release On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > If every post on this thread is being cross-posted to two lists, why is it > being conducted on two lists? All it does is expose the prospect of the > thread forking between the two lists and turning into a tangled mess. It > also forces anyone who is keen on this topic to read both lists to make sure > that eventuality is forestalled. > > I recommend that a single list be chosen for continuation. > My intent was to have the discussion on ooo-marketing. I was just notifying ooo-dev on the proposed terms and timing of the discussion. I will start a new [DISCUSS] thread on only ooo-marketing and will send a cc to ooo-dev when the [VOTE] thread kicks off as well. Sorry if this caused confusion. You can stop cross posting now. -Rob > At present, instead of providing shelter of the ooo-marketing list from the > clutter on ooo-dev, this is either adding clutter to ooo-dev or it really > needs to be a [DISCUSS] there. > > > > - Dennis E. Hamilton > tools for document interoperability, <http://nfoWorks.org/> > [email protected] gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid > > > > >
