It does not let the PPMC members *observe* the voting and any [VOTE][DISCUSS] however, unless they also subscribe.
As one pedantist to another, I'll let you handle all of those moderation requests. -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:26 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Process for deciding on branding strategy for our first release On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 to a [VOTE] conducted on the ooo-marketing list if it is expected to be a > binding agreement of the project. > > That would require the PPMC to all subscribe and it would require anyone who > is concerned with only this issue to subscribe here. > Incorrect, as you know. You can send a note to ooo-marketing, even without subscribing. You know that. In fact you did this a few hours ago. Let's put the process pedantry back in the cage. It is not helpful. -Rob > There is one place to "speak to the PPMC" in public, and it is ooo-dev. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 08:32 > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Process for deciding on branding strategy for our first release > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: >> If every post on this thread is being cross-posted to two lists, why is it >> being conducted on two lists? All it does is expose the prospect of the >> thread forking between the two lists and turning into a tangled mess. It >> also forces anyone who is keen on this topic to read both lists to make sure >> that eventuality is forestalled. >> >> I recommend that a single list be chosen for continuation. >> > > My intent was to have the discussion on ooo-marketing. I was just > notifying ooo-dev on the proposed terms and timing of the discussion. > I will start a new [DISCUSS] thread on only ooo-marketing and will > send a cc to ooo-dev when the [VOTE] thread kicks off as well. Sorry > if this caused confusion. You can stop cross posting now. > > -Rob > > >> At present, instead of providing shelter of the ooo-marketing list from the >> clutter on ooo-dev, this is either adding clutter to ooo-dev or it really >> needs to be a [DISCUSS] there. >> >> >> >> - Dennis E. Hamilton >> tools for document interoperability, <http://nfoWorks.org/> >> [email protected] gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid >> >> >> >> >> > >
