The wiki is editable you can make your own adjustments and people can judge for themselves
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Donald Harbison <[email protected]>wrote: > >> We've had a lengthy discussion on ooo-marketing regarding trademark and >> branding considerations and options. It's time we moved forward and made a >> decision in order to expedite the ongoing migration of the web site and to >> remove one more obstacle from the dev team. >> >> We want to preserve and protect the historic OpenOffice.org trademark. The >> choice of an Apache name and new trademark will not impact the historic >> mark as granted to the Apache Software Foundation for stewardship. >> >> Since this is a major decision we felt it important to bring it back to >> ooo-dev for final discussion then vote. We have the choices presented on >> the wiki[1] for your reference. >> > > I read the wiki and dont agree with the statement of .org was popular > before and not now. .Net and .Mac are other examples of the .XYZ use. > > DotGnu and other projects also claim these trend which are by no means old > projects. > > Not sure what is the base of saying this but I feel is very inaccurate. > > > >> >> [1]https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** >> Branding+Planning< >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Branding+Planning> >> > > > > -- > *Alexandro Colorado* > *OpenOffice.org* Español > http://es.openoffice.org > fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6
