-------- Original Message -------- From: Danese Cooper <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:30:29 -0800
> I must admit to wondering who "we" are in your statements, Donald. > > D See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-marketing/ Dave > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello; >> >> An important question. The vote is for choosing the >> product name, can the project name be different? >> >> To make this clear: I would think it practical to >> keep option (a) for the product, but option (b) >> for the project. >> >> Just wondering if there will be a second vote for >> the project name. >> >> regards, >> >> Pedro. >> >> --- On Wed, 11/9/11, Donald Harbison <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We've had a lengthy discussion on >>> ooo-marketing regarding trademark and >>> branding considerations and options. It's time we moved >>> forward and made a >>> decision in order to expedite the ongoing migration of the >>> web site and to >>> remove one more obstacle from the dev team. >>> >>> We want to preserve and protect the historic OpenOffice.org >>> trademark. The >>> choice of an Apache name and new trademark will not impact >>> the historic >>> mark as granted to the Apache Software Foundation for >>> stewardship. >>> >>> Since this is a major decision we felt it important to >>> bring it back to >>> ooo-dev for final discussion then vote. We have the choices >>> presented on >>> the wiki[1] for your reference. >>> >>> [1]https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** >>> Branding+Planning< >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Branding+Planning> >>> >> >
