On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28/11/2011 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>>>>>> ps. Andrea, please do link the document in the new site :).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Done some days ago in revision 1212124, but it doesn't show up on the 
>>>>>>> live instance. And actually I can't see the previous commit by you 
>>>>>>> either (revision 1203948), so I'm probably looking at the wrong pages 
>>>>>>> or I didn't trigger some update procedure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My revision 1212124 modified the SVN file
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/it/doc/manuali/index.html
>>>>>>> and I expected the new guide ("Guida al DataPilot") to appear in
>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/it/doc/manuali/index.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Similarly, Pedro's revision 1203948 modified
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/it/contribuire/legale.html
>>>>>>> but I don't see the change (Protezione dei Dati su Apache OpenOffice) at
>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/it/contribuire/legale.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should I use a different URL?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The publish step has not been applied. It is going to be huge and we 
>>>>>> need to co-ordinate w/Infrastructure. I expected to get to wrapping last 
>>>>>> week. I plan some work today. Depending on that someone should 
>>>>>> co-ordinate the publish step for ooo-site with Infrastructure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So publishing then moves it from staging to ooo-site.apache.org.    At
>>>>> the same time can we direct www.openoffice.org there?  Or is other
>>>>> work needed before we take that step?
>>>>
>>>> Depends on when we publish. Here are some of the tasks required before 
>>>> changing the DNS.
>>>>
>>>> (1) Finish the wrapping. I am adding breadcrumbs, topnav, folder specific 
>>>> topnav and adjusting the footer as best I can tell from LEGAL-104.
>>>>
>>>> (2) Make sure that Trademarks and Dennis don't have any issues with 
>>>> license notices and copyright.
>>>>
>>>> (3) Make sure that the subdomain redirections are ready for the migration.
>>>>
>>>> (4) Make sure that the places where a podling page takes precedence land 
>>>> on a proper page - contribute / participate changes.
>>>>
>>>> We might debate (4) as a prerequisite, (1), (2) and (3) are definite.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If we took the existing openoffice.org site, as-is, and hosted it on
>>> Apache, and did the redirection so it looked like openoffice.org,
>>> would there be any problem?  It would reflect the status quo on the
>>> legacy site, including possible trademark and other issues.  But it
>>> would be no worse.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, making this go live now allows all of us to start
>>> making content changes that are relevant and needed in many areas.
>>> You open it up for the other 78 of us to start contributing to the
>>> website.
>>>
>>> So if there is a way we can can the footer cleanup, etc., in-situ,
>>> then I'd urge that approach.  Otherwise we're all being held back from
>>> making meaningful corrections to the website.
>>>
>>
>> Or to put it differently, let's not let graduation requirements hold
>> us back from going live with the new hosting.
>
> Since you started another thread. Let's discuss this there. Or better wait 
> until tomorrow and the situation might differ.
>

That's OK.  I'm looking to help, not to debate.  I'm sure there are
others who would like to help as well, on the content editing side.
But it is bottlenecked right now.

-Rob

> Regards,
> Dave
>
>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>  Andrea.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to