On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 28/11/2011 Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>>>>>>>>> ps. Andrea, please do link the document in the new site :). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Done some days ago in revision 1212124, but it doesn't show up on the >>>>>>>>> live instance. And actually I can't see the previous commit by you >>>>>>>>> either (revision 1203948), so I'm probably looking at the wrong pages >>>>>>>>> or I didn't trigger some update procedure. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My revision 1212124 modified the SVN file >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/it/doc/manuali/index.html >>>>>>>>> and I expected the new guide ("Guida al DataPilot") to appear in >>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/it/doc/manuali/index.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Similarly, Pedro's revision 1203948 modified >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/it/contribuire/legale.html >>>>>>>>> but I don't see the change (Protezione dei Dati su Apache OpenOffice) >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/it/contribuire/legale.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Should I use a different URL? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Try http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The publish step has not been applied. It is going to be huge and we >>>>>>>> need to co-ordinate w/Infrastructure. I expected to get to wrapping >>>>>>>> last week. I plan some work today. Depending on that someone should >>>>>>>> co-ordinate the publish step for ooo-site with Infrastructure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So publishing then moves it from staging to ooo-site.apache.org. At >>>>>>> the same time can we direct www.openoffice.org there? Or is other >>>>>>> work needed before we take that step? >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on when we publish. Here are some of the tasks required before >>>>>> changing the DNS. >>>>>> >>>>>> (1) Finish the wrapping. I am adding breadcrumbs, topnav, folder >>>>>> specific topnav and adjusting the footer as best I can tell from >>>>>> LEGAL-104. >>>>>> >>>>>> (2) Make sure that Trademarks and Dennis don't have any issues with >>>>>> license notices and copyright. >>>>>> >>>>>> (3) Make sure that the subdomain redirections are ready for the >>>>>> migration. >>>>>> >>>>>> (4) Make sure that the places where a podling page takes precedence land >>>>>> on a proper page - contribute / participate changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> We might debate (4) as a prerequisite, (1), (2) and (3) are definite. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If we took the existing openoffice.org site, as-is, and hosted it on >>>>> Apache, and did the redirection so it looked like openoffice.org, >>>>> would there be any problem? It would reflect the status quo on the >>>>> legacy site, including possible trademark and other issues. But it >>>>> would be no worse. >>>>> >>>>> On the other hand, making this go live now allows all of us to start >>>>> making content changes that are relevant and needed in many areas. >>>>> You open it up for the other 78 of us to start contributing to the >>>>> website. >>>>> >>>>> So if there is a way we can can the footer cleanup, etc., in-situ, >>>>> then I'd urge that approach. Otherwise we're all being held back from >>>>> making meaningful corrections to the website. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Or to put it differently, let's not let graduation requirements hold >>>> us back from going live with the new hosting. >>> >>> Since you started another thread. Let's discuss this there. Or better wait >>> until tomorrow and the situation might differ. >>> >> >> That's OK. I'm looking to help, not to debate. I'm sure there are >> others who would like to help as well, on the content editing side. >> But it is bottlenecked right now. > > That is a matter of opinion. Several people have made commits to ooo-site. > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/website-local.html >
No one is looking to edit ooo-site purely for the sake of editing. They want to have it published where users will actually see it. Right now, if someone wants to edit the non-wiki portions of openoffice.org then they are bottlenecked. Going live with your (and Kay's) great ooo-site work will eliminate that bottleneck. -Rob > I would avoid the CMS bookmarklet for ooo-site as it would take 30 minutes > for an internal checkout. > > Regards, > Dave > >> >> -Rob >> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>>> >>>>> -Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Dave >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Andrea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
