All set. Just did a full site build and it went thru no trouble.
----- Original Message ----- > From: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM > Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites > > I'm working with Gav to get the timeout upped as that's what's > causing the builds to fail (long delays when the built site gets > checked back in). I will let you know once I have things ready > for you to make mass changes to the ooo-site. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Dave Fisher <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:32 PM >> Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites >> >> >> On Dec 11, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >>> Why don't you just decide to make the current ooo-site live, >>> and tell infra to change dns for www.openoffice.org to point >>> at it? >> >> There is an outstanding question about exactly how the extensions and > templates >> authenticate users. It is being investigated. >> >> Also the subdomain map needs to be built. >> >>> I've made some performance enhancements to the CMS today so >>> web checkouts will only take a few seconds as opposed to 30min. >> >> That's wonderful! >> >>> Also I will be working on your site's build because it is in a >>> terrible state, but that will take more time. >> >> Too much was committed at once. >> >> So, we don't collide let me know if you are working with templates or > lib, I >> am (or was) about to play with that part. I am really effin, tired of being > >> yelled at at repeatedly by Rob. >> >> When I'm done with my plan nearly every html file in ooo-site will be >> updated, how do you want to co-ordinate that? >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Rob Weir <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 7:55 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Dave Fisher >> <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Dave Fisher >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've already answered. I've been very clear. >> Nothing has >>>> stopped others from working on ooo-site. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I apologize if I was not clear. I'm not interested in > >> editing >>>>>> ooo-site.apache.org. >>>>> >>>>> And I happen to think that this is absolute nonsense. ooo-site > will >> be >>>> www.openoffice.org when the time comes. Waiting is a bogus excuse. >>>>> >>>> >>>> To the extent that you continue to not understand what I am saying > I >>>> will continue to repeat myself, attempting various ways of >>>> reformulating my point. >>>> >>>> I want to update www.openoffice.org. I do not want to update only >>>> your test server. I want the changes I make now to be reflected > on >>>> the public, user facing openoffice.org website after a simple > staging >>>> and publication stage, i.e., near real time, no more than a few >>>> minutes delay. That is what the project needs. This is what we > all >>>> need. The fact that we can can easily update ooo-site, a staging >>>> website that no user actually ever sees is a partial success only. >>>> >>>> What I hear you saying is that we're free to update the data > in >>>> /ooo-site and that will then appear on the test staging server. > That >>>> is nice. But the changes that you, me and others have made on > that >>>> content is not being seen by real users. It is stuck in limbo. > We >>>> can invite committers to stick more content into limbo, of course, > to >>>> queue it up for publication at some indeterminate point in the > future. >>>> But I'm more interested in what we need to do to get the > content >> out >>>> of limbo and live on www.openoffice.org. How do we complete this? >>>> >>>> So this is not about ooo-site. This is about the complete > publication >>>> pipeline. That is what matters for the PPMC's ability to > properly >>>> manage the www.openoffice.org website. Nothing is live until the > PPMC >>>> can effectively update the real site. >>>> >>>> Remember, what our users have on www.openoffice.org is very wrong > in >>>> many places. We're continuing every day to harm the project > if >> that >>>> content remains as-is and is not replaced by accurate project >>>> information. The fact that some of the content is corrected in > SVN >>>> or on ooo-site is not enough. >>>> >>>> If at all possible, I'd urge us to take a "release early, > >> release >>>> often" approach to the website migration rather than a > "big >> bang >>>> integration" approach. >>>> >>>> What is the minimum that really needs to be done to make this site > go >>>> live? And how can I, and anyone else who is interested in >>>> accelerating this work, help? >>>> >>>> -Rob >>>> >> >
