Rob, are you saying that you would not edit ooo-site simply because it is not being served as OpenOffice.org ?
There are many ways that assistance is welcome, especially if folks notice the breakages and report them in a way where they can be swept up in the preparation of the staging site either before or after cut-over. I believe that is a false contrast. Perhaps it is simply that folks aren't aware that help proofing and coming up with fixes to the site are welcome. Folks can see the results on ooo-site, come up with further ideas, etc. Think of it as the running draft version of the soon-to-migrate OpenOffice.org site. - Dennis PS 1. This podling has not been in existence for 6 months (yet); site migration and terms of use was not early on the agenda by any means. 2. Leave me out of the hyperbole please. 3. I also believe that I said I had no objection to the current wording on the wiki notice. If not, I'm saying it now. I have no objection to this: < http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights&oldid=198563>. It addresses my fundamental concern. 4. And I have had nothing whatsoever to do with any extended duration of this particular thread. Although thanks for the inviting mention. -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:06 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites [ ... ] Again, the ability to edit absent the ability to publish, is not going to encourage effective collaboration. Let's get to "release early and often" on the website. Waiting months for the ability to publish is not healthy for the community. So what is the least that is required technically to make this live? We can deal with your and Dennis's 6 month long debate about terms of use later. [ ... ]
