On 17 December 2011 15:44, Simon Phipps <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael's has the advantage that it shows the > relative adoption of the various lines, something that Rob's (by including > every possible variant regardless of relevance) tends to hide.
It's not the relative adoption I want to show. If I did want that then Michaels would indeed be a better document). Ross > > S. > On Dec 17, 2011 2:53 PM, "Ross Gardler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Simon, unfortunately the representation here, indicating the date of >> the last release as the end of the line (literally) is not really the >> message I'm after. >> >> Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. >> On Dec 17, 2011 2:40 PM, "Simon Phipps" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > On 17 Dec 2011, at 01:29, Ross Gardler wrote: >> > >> > > On 15 November 2011 22:47, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> http://www.robweir.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/oo-forks.png >> > > >> > > Rob. I might need to reuse this, can I assume it is OK to do so. I >> > > don't plan to edit it in any way, just rename it to "oo-derivatives" >> > > (or similar) and move to an apache.org address. >> > >> > Did you also see Michael Meeks' attempt to visualise this context? >> > http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2011-11-18-graphs.html >> > >> > While it's also flawed, it has a number of advantages over Rob's graph in >> > helping people understand the current state of the community and the >> extent >> > of its diversity. >> > >> > S. >> > >> > >> > >> -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
