2012/1/13 Jürgen Schmidt <[email protected]>: > Hi Ross, > > sorry for my top posting. > > I have only one point that is important for me. The hosting aspect of binary > extensions and templates is a very important part and we should ensure can > we can provide such a service in some way.
Yes, I think we all (including the board) agree. This is evidenced by their willingness to approve Gavs proposal. Can you please state explicitly whether you perceive a problem with the SF proposal or not. It is my understanding that the consensus here is to accept the SF proposal, it is this that I am seeking advice from the board on. I don't want to open up the whole discussion again, the majority position is certainly to accept the SF proposal. However, if you feel this is a mistake I would like to understand you precise concerns so that I might respond to any questions from the board with maximum clarity. Note the proposal taken to the board is for the SF proposal to be an interim solution with the intention of the AOO project providing a longer term solution more tailored to the needs of the project and its users. Ross
