I do feel that we need to continue to focus on the issues at hand. We wouldn't want this project to fall into extinction after all these years now would we?
On 3/12/12, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/12/12 13:42, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'm not suggesting we argue with anyone. I'm suggesting we make >>> truthful positive statements about this project and the experience >>> level of its participants. >>> >> >> FWIW, and just my humble opinion ... >> >> I don't think we should spend time discussing such arguments >> when we have the one instrument that defines the true >> continuation of the project, namely www.openoffice.org . >> > > Oh, I'm sure we all have our own preferred ways of doing this. The > nice thing is that they are not mutually exclusive. We only need to > agree to be accurate and positive. We don't need to agree on a > narrow set of specific communications. Some volunteers might work > better with HTML, others with YouTube videos, others with graphics. > Let's find more ways of saying "yes and" instead of "no, but". > > -Rob >
