Please cancel all emails to me. Tkanks On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Larry Gusaas <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > On 2012-03-30 10:16 PM Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Larry Gusaas<[email protected] > >** > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Quit trying to weasel out of admitting you made an erroneous statement. > >>> > >>> Having a Windows only statement means the point #1 is not done and not > >>> available for all platforms. Your statement indicates you don't care > >>> about > >>> Mac or Linux users. Of course, you do work for IBM. > >>> > >> Take a chill pill Larry. I gave just one example. I could have easily > >> given another one, any of these, that are cross platform and allows > cloud > >> storage of documents: > >> > >> http://extensions.services.**openoffice.org/en/project/**ooo2gd< > http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/ooo2gd> > >> > >> http://extensions.services.**openoffice.org/en/project/**smartcloud< > http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/smartcloud> > >> > >> http://extensions.services.**openoffice.org/en/project/** > >> alfrescoconnector< > http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/alfrescoconnector> > >> > > > > Good. You finally gave an useful response. Why didn't you do so in your > > first response to me? > > > > > > > I was not responding to you. i was responding to Cody Miller who asked the > original question. > > > > > The fact remains that you are merely being argumentative, and have > nothing > >> to offer to this conversation. > >> > > > > No I wasn't. I finally get an useful response to my original post. And > > still you belittle me for pointing out the inadequacies of your original > > post. > > > > > Again, yours was not the original post. It was Cody's. > > Imagine we changed the topic slightly: > > Cody: I have a really great idea. How about a machine that flies through > the air and carries people from one city to another? > > Rob: It is easy, and in fact is already done, via airplanes. For example, > this airplane: www.lufthansa.com > > Larry: It is not already done. I checked the Lufthansa website and they do > not fly to my city. Rob, your statement was inaccurate, Quit trying to > weasel out of admitting you made an erroneous statement. Your statement > indicates you don't care about small Canadian cities. Of course, you do > work for IBM. > > Exactly parallel to above, but do you see how inappropriate such a response > would be seen? > > The verb "to done" and its participle "done" is a very flexible word in > English. It has dozens of meanings listed in any good dictionary. Its > subtitles and idioms can vex even native English speakers. So I have a lot > of sympathy for how hard it must be for non-native speakers. > > -Rob > > > > > > > -- > > ______________________________**___ > > > > Larry I. Gusaas > > Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada > > Website: http://larry-gusaas.com > > "An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind > > theirs." - Edgard Varese > > > > > > >
