Hi. 2012/4/29 Rob Weir <[email protected]>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Albino Biasutti Neto > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi. > >> > >> 2012/4/28 Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > >> > >>> > >>> On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> >> Thanks Andrea. > >>> >> > >>> >> On Apr 28, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> Rob Weir wrote: > >>> >>>> In return, and to demonstrate that this is not about control on my > >>> >>>> part, I'm happy to listen to any proposal you [Alexandro] might > have > >>> regarding > >>> >>>> open PPMC access to the Twitter account. And if you make your > Twitter > >>> >>>> account just as openly available to PPMC members as I've done > with the > >>> >>>> new one, then I'll be happy to notify followers of the new Twitter > >>> >>>> account that they should follow the one that you turn over to PPMC > >>> >>>> control. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> This is a very reasonable proposal and it would be a positive, > >>> constructive outcome of this long discussion. Just to clarify, I'm not > >>> personally interested in managing any of the "social" OpenOffice > channels, > >>> let alone posting content there: I would just like that the project > has one > >>> clear official channel on each social media, with shared access. Users > are > >>> already confused enough. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On Apr 28, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> It would be good if you close those accounts and work with the ones > >>> >>> that were already working. Like I said before doesnt make sense to > >>> >>> duplicate efforts. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Agreed. Now if Alexandro and Rob will just work together... on > >>> management, tools and strategy. It will be great. I'm looking forward > to it. > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > I think you miss the point entirely, Dave. This is not about > >>> > Alexandro. This is not about me. This is about what the PPMC wants. > >>> > We've already had a discussion on this list about official pages and > >>> > the decisions from that thread have already been implemented. those > >>> > pages are under PPMC control. We did not need anything from > Alexandro > >>> > to do that. We still don't. > >>> > >>> I get your point. I have a different point. We may not "need" > Alexandro to > >>> do anything, but I want him involved, and if I am reading correctly > others > >>> do as well. > >>> > >>> Community over code, dude. We "want" to work together. > >>> > >>> Have a good weekend. I have no desire to discuss this further. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Dave > >>> > >>> - World peace - not whirled peas > >>> > >>> > > >>> > -Rob > >>> > > >>> >> Regards, > >>> >> Dave > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Regards, > >>> >>> Andrea. > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >> The social network is to write/speak on annuncius the aoo, continually. > >> > >> I can also contribute to the any networks, ok. > >> > >> Best, > >> Albino @bino28 > > > > > Good I will add you to the Google plus page. > > Thanks! We have G+ page, this isn't page oficial [1]. > -1 to that. > > We're limiting authoring rights to PPMC members. Also, we already > have a Google+ page. > > I understand aoo political. > Since you've expressed interest in avoiding duplication of effort, > could you please give some attention to getting the PPMC involved in > your OpenOffice.org Facebook page. You could actually accomplish > something there if you tried. > > -Rob > identi.ca and twitter = ok hastag = ok g+ = ok 1 - http://plus.google.com/u/0/114598373874764163668 fbook = not Social networking is important, it also marketing the aoo, all know. This discussion has been held on what I read, I *apologize for something. Best, Albino
