On 4/28/12, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]> > wrote: > > <snip> > >> >> I did address some issues that need to be fixed before moving them to >> PPMC control, you have also skip those discussions without an answer. >> These accounts will continue to work, with or without your permission. >> I am not sure what make you think that you can say what is official or >> not more than I do. Many people have shown their concern with >> duplicating efforts as a bad idea and you have simply not address >> that. You rather clone the accounts than work with them. >> > > What makes me think I can say what is the official Google+ page? Easy > answer: I started a thread called "[Proposal] Official Google+ Page > for Apache OpenOffice" and gathered feedback. The PPMC reaction was > favorable. I then added other PPMC members to the account, so it was > not just me controlling the account. We discussed how openly and > transparently how we would use the account. We then branded the > account with the project logo, sent out an announcement started > posting relevant content. > > It is not what I *say* that makes the account official. It is what I > do. Handing over control, working with the PPMC, making proposals, > getting their feedback, these are all things that are part of it. In > the end, it is not *my* account. It is it the PPMC's. That is what > makes the difference. > > I agree duplicating effort is bad. But we are not duplicating effort. > As I pointed out, you've done absolutely nothing with the Google+ > page. There is zero effort there. Nothing done since November. So > we're not duplicating anything. > > If you want to avoid duplicating effort and avoid confusing users, why > don't you agree to direct the followers of your Google+ page to the > active one and to shut yours down? Why won't you do this right now? > I think it is an undebatable point that the new Google+ page is: > > 1) Under PPMC control > 2) Is actively being used > 3) Is integrated with the project's webpage > 4) Is growing rapidly > > It is also undebatable that your page: > > A) Has not been used since last November > B) You have not proposed it as an official project page > C) You have not integrated it into the project's website > D) You have not put it under PPMC control > > So given the above, please tell us why you continue with that page? > Why not direct the users to active page and shut yours down? Is this > just about personal control? If not, then what is your justification? > > -Rob >
You keep ignoring the question I asked you many times so far. Why you never provided content to the G+ account in 6 months? -- Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Español http://es.openoffice.org
