On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Andrea. > > On Apr 28, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> In return, and to demonstrate that this is not about control on my >>> part, I'm happy to listen to any proposal you [Alexandro] might have >>> regarding >>> open PPMC access to the Twitter account. And if you make your Twitter >>> account just as openly available to PPMC members as I've done with the >>> new one, then I'll be happy to notify followers of the new Twitter >>> account that they should follow the one that you turn over to PPMC >>> control. >> >> This is a very reasonable proposal and it would be a positive, constructive >> outcome of this long discussion. Just to clarify, I'm not personally >> interested in managing any of the "social" OpenOffice channels, let alone >> posting content there: I would just like that the project has one clear >> official channel on each social media, with shared access. Users are already >> confused enough. > > > On Apr 28, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> It would be good if you close those accounts and work with the ones >> that were already working. Like I said before doesnt make sense to >> duplicate efforts. > > > Agreed. Now if Alexandro and Rob will just work together... on management, > tools and strategy. It will be great. I'm looking forward to it. >
I think you miss the point entirely, Dave. This is not about Alexandro. This is not about me. This is about what the PPMC wants. We've already had a discussion on this list about official pages and the decisions from that thread have already been implemented. those pages are under PPMC control. We did not need anything from Alexandro to do that. We still don't. -Rob > Regards, > Dave > > >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >
