With 1100 builds so far the ooo-site CMS instance is only 350 builds behind www.apache.org as the most-used CMS tree so far. I monitor the CMS logs daily to evaluate usage and this project publishes about as often as all our other projects combined, which really makes me wonder where we'd be here if the org had never created the CMS in the first place.
The ooo-site is far and away the largest instance at over 9GB total. The reason I'm writing here is to ask general questions about user satisfaction with the CMS: 1) Is there any aspect of the CMS that needs immediate improvement? 2) Are you satisfied with the workflow, or are there areas that could stand improvement? 3) Is there anything that should be done to encourage more users who are not committers to use the CMS to submit patches to the list? 4) Are there any UI features you'd like to see implemented, either in the web interface or the publication script? Thanks in advance for taking the time to answer a few of these!
