Hi Joe, On May 11, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> With 1100 builds so far the ooo-site CMS instance > is only 350 builds behind www.apache.org as the > most-used CMS tree so far. I monitor the CMS logs > daily to evaluate usage and this project publishes > about as often as all our other projects combined, > which really makes me wonder where we'd be here if > the org had never created the CMS in the first place. I wonder too, but it would have been very painful. The enhancements made to the build process over the last year have made this use possible. > The ooo-site is far and away the largest instance at > over 9GB total. The reason I'm writing here is to > ask general questions about user satisfaction with > the CMS: > > 1) Is there any aspect of the CMS that needs immediate > improvement? I would like read_text_file to be able to handle BOM characters without issue. > 2) Are you satisfied with the workflow, or are there areas > that could stand improvement? Pretty much am. > 3) Is there anything that should be done to encourage more > users who are not committers to use the CMS to submit patches > to the list? Direct submission of the patch to BZ or JIRA including name, etc. Configured on a project by project basis. > 4) Are there any UI features you'd like to see implemented, > either in the web interface or the publication script? Warnings when (a) a staging build is in process. (b) when the change is in lib or templates and might require more than an instant to stage. > > > Thanks in advance for taking the time to answer a few of these! You're welcome. Regards, Dave
