On 2012/10/20 22:49, RGB ES said: > 2012/10/20 jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> >> I really like the logo on the openOffice.org site, it is (at least to me) >> more modern and eye-catching. > +1 >> We should only use 1 logo, that is simpler and for the end-user more >> understandable. > +1 too.
I happen to have a 300x100 logo at hand, so I updated it. Feel free
to revise it if you feel my uploaded logo is ugly.
>> On 20 October 2012 16:28, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> See upper left here: http://openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>> The "Incubating" is integrated into the graphic.
>>>
>>> The underlying file is here: a PNG with transparent background.
>>>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/images/300x100_dj_trans.png
>>>
>>> What do we want to do here?
>>>
>>> 1) Edit that graphic to remove "Incubating"?
>>>
>>> 2) Use a different graphic?
>>>
>>> Note that the http://www.openoffice.org/ site uses a different form of
>>> the branding. Are we intentionally using two different logos here?
>>> Do we want to continue this?
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>
>
--
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' <ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
<<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
