2012/10/23 Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> > > > On 10/22/2012 02:18 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 20/10/2012 imacat wrote: >> >>> I happen to have a 300x100 logo at hand, so I updated it. Feel free >>> to revise it if you feel my uploaded logo is ugly. >>> >> >> I think that this was good as a temporary solution, but that we should >> delete it now, since it has different colors and we don't want >> "variants" (in fonts, colors) of the chosen logo around unless they are >> clearly marked as proposals. >> >> The reference logo is >> http://www.openoffice.org/**images/AOO_logos/AOO-logo-**hires.jpg<http://www.openoffice.org/images/AOO_logos/AOO-logo-hires.jpg> >> and apparently it was supplied as a JPG; PNG would be much better, SVG >> would be totally better, but the source so far is this one and it was >> contributed by Michael Acevedo. What we have in SVG and (possibly) PNG >> was derived from this one. >> > > svg should be: > > http://www.openoffice.org/**images/AOO_logos/svg/OOo_**Website_v2_copy.svg<http://www.openoffice.org/images/AOO_logos/svg/OOo_Website_v2_copy.svg> > > AFAIK, that svg is just a "container" for the raster image: it do not contain a vector image.
Regards Ricardo > should we give it a better name? > > > >> The logo at >> http://incubator.apache.org/**openofficeorg/images/300x100_**dj_trans.png<http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/images/300x100_dj_trans.png> >> has different colors and different fonts so I would remove it now that >> it is no longer used at >> http://incubator.apache.org/**openofficeorg/<http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/>; >> or >> is it still being used somewhere? >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >> > > -- > ------------------------------**------------------------------** > ------------ > MzK > > "Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never > dealt with a cat." > -- Robert Heinlein >
