Thanks for your kind words. see below please:
On 24 October 2012 19:49, Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 12-10-16, at 12:22 , jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also > combining > > all the notes on open issues I could find. > > > Thanks. A lot of work. Last it was dealt with was probably (prior to > Apache's advent) back in…. I hate to say, "last century." > > > Please have a look at: > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf > Indeed. > > > > > and > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO > > > > I hope we can have a discussion on the "open issues", and then I will > make > > a design document for a changed workflow. > > > > I look forward to hear your opinion, either through wiki or mail. These > > comments will be worked into the document. > > > > have a nice day. > > jan I > > I'll go over it. Usually, as others no doubt will mention, my impression > is that a big issue has always been qualifying the outcome, incorporating > input, and normalizing it, so that what happens in, say, January, can be > expected to continue on into the future. > It was a big job, first describing the current process and run it several times to make sure I understood it, and then think about how to do more robust and future oriented. I have had a helping hand from my professional background where I used to manage project with these kind of problemsets. I would appreciate any input, this is a floating process, development/discussion. > > A sidle point has perhaps also do with working with the LibreOffice > team—and others working using similar strings, e.g., those nice people at > that Mozilla project, among others. Under the Sun regime, licensing issues > foreclosed that option. I'd hate to think we are still hobbled by political > considerations and that these undercut the terrific enterprise of people > like you. > I am very open minded to that respect, but honestly I have no idea what the apache policy is. > > Thanks > Louis
