May I politely ask if there are other comments or more importantly objections ?
If not I will continue with the process and keep you posted, please remember comments are also welcome as the new workflow takes shape. Jan I. On 24 October 2012 20:18, jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your kind words. > > see below please: > > > On 24 October 2012 19:49, Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jan, >> >> On 12-10-16, at 12:22 , jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also >> combining >> > all the notes on open issues I could find. >> > >> Thanks. A lot of work. Last it was dealt with was probably (prior to >> Apache's advent) back in…. I hate to say, "last century." >> >> > Please have a look at: >> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf >> Indeed. >> >> > >> > and >> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO >> > >> > I hope we can have a discussion on the "open issues", and then I will >> make >> > a design document for a changed workflow. >> > >> > I look forward to hear your opinion, either through wiki or mail. These >> > comments will be worked into the document. >> > >> > have a nice day. >> > jan I >> >> I'll go over it. Usually, as others no doubt will mention, my impression >> is that a big issue has always been qualifying the outcome, incorporating >> input, and normalizing it, so that what happens in, say, January, can be >> expected to continue on into the future. >> > It was a big job, first describing the current process and run it several > times to make sure I understood it, and then think about how to do more > robust and future oriented. I have had a helping hand from my professional > background where I used to manage project with these kind of problemsets. > > I would appreciate any input, this is a floating process, > development/discussion. > > >> >> A sidle point has perhaps also do with working with the LibreOffice >> team—and others working using similar strings, e.g., those nice people at >> that Mozilla project, among others. Under the Sun regime, licensing issues >> foreclosed that option. I'd hate to think we are still hobbled by political >> considerations and that these undercut the terrific enterprise of people >> like you. >> > I am very open minded to that respect, but honestly I have no idea what > the apache policy is. > >> >> Thanks >> Louis > > >
